Research

Auxiliare — the capstone study

The research behind Auxiliare: whether preference-based matching and video pitches could actually connect Filipino founders with the investors looking for them.

Built for
University of Batangas CICT — a capstone study, co-authored with two classmates
My role
Lead Platform Developer & Co-author
When
AY 2025–2026

The situation

Founders and investors were meeting whoever they happened to know, with no shared, trustworthy place for the two to find each other. Before building anything, the question worth answering was whether a matching platform would help at all — and how you would find out, rather than assume it.

What I built

We built the platform in order to answer it: Laravel and React over PostgreSQL, matching people on the preferences they stated rather than on introductions, and letting founders upload a video pitch for investors to review. It ran on an Agile cycle, and ten people tested it through online surveys, five founders and five investors, with what they said driving each round of changes.

Capstone project, AY 2025–2026. Lead platform developer and co-author with Anthon Jay M. Delgado and Jmark Zeus P. Alday, using mixed methods and an Agile SDLC.

What it lets people do

  1. 01Match a founder to investors on stated preferences rather than introductions
  2. 02Let a founder upload a video pitch for an investor to watch before meeting
  3. 03Test the matching with real founders and investors, then change what they found confusing

Recognition

  • Best Capstone Project
    University of Batangas CICT 2026
  • Best Capstone Presenter
    University of Batangas CICT 2026
  • 2nd Best Research Paper
    University of Batangas UBIAN LEGACY 2026
  • 2nd Best Research Poster
    University of Batangas UBIAN LEGACY 2026

Under the hood

The tools this is built with. You do not need to know any of them to use it — open one if you are curious what it does.

If you're considering working together

How a project actually goes

No jargon, no long contract to decode, and no stage where you are asked to approve something you cannot picture.

  1. 01

    We talk about the problem

    Not the software — the problem. What is slow, what gets forgotten, what people keep having to redo by hand. Usually one call is enough to see the shape of it.

  2. 02

    I write down what I heard

    In plain language, before any building starts, so you can correct me while it is still cheap to correct. You approve it or you don't.

  3. 03

    You see it early and often

    Working pieces, not screenshots or promises. If something is wrong, you say so while there is still time to change it.

  4. 04

    It goes live and stays supported

    Hosting, domain and setup handled. The Valley O'Ville site has been running since 2023 — I don't disappear after launch.

Have something in mind?

Tell me what is not working. If I'm not the right person for it, I'll say so and point you somewhere better.